Archive for July, 2010

Runaway federal spending good for special interests, bad for the rest of us

Posted in Liberty Points by R Lee Wrights on July 31st, 2010

by Brian Irving

“Over the past few years, U.S. government debt held by the public has grown rapidly - to the point that, compared with the total output of the economy, it is now higher than it has ever been except during the period around World War II.”

That’s the chilling opening line of a brief recently released by the Congressional Budget Office. The non-partisan CBO warns that without significant policy reforms “growing budget deficits will cause debt to rise to unsupportable levels.”

By 2020, they predict the national debut will be 90 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product.

Things will get worse, the brief concludes, when “the growing imbalance between revenues and non-interest spending, combined with the spiraling cost of interest payments, [will] swiftly push federal debt to unsustainable levels.”

Meanwhile, the White House Office of Management and Budget reports that fiscal year federal spending was 24.7 percent of GDP in 2009, is expected to be 24.6 percent this year and rise to 25.1 percent in 2011.

Read the rest of this entry »

The tragedy of terrorism: From Afghanistan to Iraq

Posted in LFA Flashback by R Lee Wrights on July 30th, 2010

by R. Lee Wrights

What a difference a year makes. It’s amazing what drastic changes can transpire over such a relatively short span of time. It is astounding how quickly a basically peaceable people can be led down the road to War.

It is saddening, indeed sickening, to see how easily Americans, swept up in the emotional tidal wave of patriotism, can be persuaded to endorse and advocate the use of the mightiest military force on the face of the earth against people who have never done them any harm. In less than one year a desire for revenge has transformed peace-loving Americans into a nation of warriors who march in lockstep behind a my-way-or-the-highway leader. How many atrocities throughout history have been wrought in exactly the same fashion?

And to think, it all began in a little impoverished country that has been a bloody battlefield for decades already called Afghanistan.  How convenient.

In the aftermath of the horrible terrorist attack in New York City on September 11, 2001, American justice acted swiftly.  On little evidence, or none at all as far as we know, the government determined that a group of religious zealots, based in Afghanistan, were responsible for the tragedy that shocked the world.  Specifically, President Bush claimed to have proof, which he could not share with the people he works for, that a man named Osama bin Laden had ordered the mass murder of thousands of Americans. Within a month of the World Trade Center crumbling to the ground before our very eyes, America was preparing to make war in a country that not one of the hijacking terrorists called home. Americans cheered and bought more flags as bombs began to fall on innocent people in a nation that had not attacked us nor even threatened to do so. And some of us wept.

Read the rest of this entry »

Your innocence is no protection

Posted in Liberty's Lessons by R Lee Wrights on July 29th, 2010

by Harry Browne

When the politicians violate the Bill of Rights with the Patriot Act or some other guaranteed-to-bring-peace-and-security-to-the-world scheme, they always reassure us by saying:

“If you aren’t guilty, you have nothing to fear.”

If only that were so. The truth is that innocence is no protection at all against government agencies with the power to do what they think best - or against a government agent hoping for promotion and willing to do whatever he can get away with.

o   Tell a businessman he has nothing to fear from the piles of forms he must file to prove he doesn’t discriminate.

o Tell a home owner he has nothing to fear when his property is seized by the government in a mistaken - or contrived - drug raid.

Read the rest of this entry »

If Libertarians save one life

Posted in Deadly Politics by R Lee Wrights on July 28th, 2010

by LP staff

The War in Afghanistan has dragged on for almost nine years. According to the Washington Post, there have been 1,189 American military deaths, which is more than two per week.

And of course, today’s big news about WikiLeaks raises a lot of questions about whether we’ve been honestly told how badly the war is going.

I’m often asked how Libertarian candidates make a difference in cases where they don’t win their election. We have over 150 candidates running for U.S. Representative, and over 20 for U.S. Senator.

Here’s how: ending the war sooner will save both lives and money. I’m also convinced that ending the war sooner will reduce terrorism, although I understand some others disagree.

Read the rest of this entry »

Good news, bad news

Posted in Liberty's Lady by R Lee Wrights on July 27th, 2010

by Lady Liberty

Some of you know that I used to work in the news media. Maybe it’s that insider viewpoint that makes it especially disgusting to me when I see the state of journalism-and I use the term loosely-today.

It wasn’t so very long ago that news was news, editorials were editorials, and the line between the two was both clear and sacrosanct. Today, there are times I’m hard pressed to tell the difference. Worse than that are the times where the difference is obvious but the labels are backwards.

I like to catch up on the news every morning while I’m getting ready for work. I’m not entirely sure why I bother any more. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve actually found myself, hairbrush in hand, shouting back at the TV over one inexcusably biased, or outright error-filled, report.

Just the other day, there was a short feature the purpose of which seemed to be to chastise those who were criticizing the president for his speech to schoolchildren. The reporter cut to a so-called expert who proceeded to lambaste conservatives. The president was merely going to encourage students to work hard and to set goals, he explained. What could possibly be wrong with that, he asked. The reporter shook his head at anyone who would protest such a thing. As usual, both of them selectively ignored the point entirely.

Read the rest of this entry »

Stating the bleeding obvious: Part 2

Posted in Liberty's Friend by R Lee Wrights on July 26th, 2010

by Larken Rose

“But how is this legal plunder to be identified? … See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime.”

- Frédéric Bastiat

My last “bleeding obvious” article addressed the absurd notion that anyone could ever be morally obligated to disregard his own moral conscience. But the concepts of “authority” and “government” depend entirely upon the insane notion that, at least in some cases, it is bad for people to do what they think is right (if the politicians call it “illegal”), and good for people to do what they think is wrong (if “the law” commands it). Statism relies upon such insanity. But that is not the only way to demonstrate the insanity of the superstition called “government.” (This next one, many of you have seen before.)

Question: Can you give to someone else a right that you don’t have?

Here are your two possible answers:

Yes, I can delegate to others a right that I do not have. That would mean that even though it is immoral for me to do certain things (committing theft, assault, murder, whatever), I can nonetheless bestow moral permission on someone else, giving them the right to do such things.

Read the rest of this entry »

Setting the record straight about Steve Kubby

Posted in NtheDrgWar by R Lee Wrights on July 25th, 2010

by Thomas L. Knapp

Two things I learned from “Scarface,” a heckuva movie.

Lesson Number One: Don’t underestimate the other guy’s greed!

Lesson Number Two: Don’t get high on your own supply.

Steve Kubby learned Lesson Number One the hard way.

Cannabis Science apparently still hasn’t learned Lesson Number Two.

Before I go any further, disclaimer time: I did some contract writing work for Cannex Therapeutics before it entered into its ill-advised — and now canceled nunc pro tunc (remember that term, it’s important) — deal with Cannabis Science, Inc. I intend, or at least hope, to be involved in future projects with Steve Kubby. I am not a disinterested party here.

On the other side of the ledger, this post is not a sponsored post. It’s my opinion, for which I take sole responsibility, and I’m not being paid by Kubby or by anyone else to write it except to the extent that I may move some DVDs on affiliate commission or collect some advertising revenues for page views, etc. I do not own, nor have I ever owned, any shares in Cannabis Science, Inc., nor do I hold any “short positions” or other tools for profiting through manipulation of CBIS’s stock value. Nor, frankly, would I want to unless, as seems increasingly likely, CBIS stock certificates at some point become cheaper than retail-price toilet paper.

Read the rest of this entry »

Three imperial edicts

Posted in The N.C. Way by R Lee Wrights on July 24th, 2010

by Sean Haugh

This is something written for Praxis for the People, briefly a neat Green zine from Asheville NC, five years ago this month:

The question is fascinating, “if (I could) pass any three pieces of legislation, without having to worry about the approval of Congress, what would they be?” I always associate legislation specifically with congress or the general assembly. I can relieve that contradiction by framing my answers not as legislation, but rather as executive orders, or even better, edicts.

So, as the Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico (my preferred title, after Emperor Norton), here are my first three proclamations:

1) I would abolish marriage licenses. To me, that’s the most offensive thing government does (short of killing people). At its root, it’s nothing but a state license to love - I am outraged, that they would think for a moment this is any of their business. Who and how people choose to love, well, I can hardly imagine a more personal matter. The marriage license is the lynchpin in government’s ability to define the family. The world would be a much happier place if families could simply define themselves.

Read the rest of this entry »

Principles of Liberty: 16 affirmations for those who would live free

Posted in LFA Flashback by R Lee Wrights on July 23rd, 2010

by Kevin Tuma

courtesy of Kevin TumaI. I was born free. No government can sanction my freedom, or take it away.

II. I believe the government should be as small as possible, and its laws should be as minimal as possible.

III. I acknowledge that free speech is a fundamental human right; any controls upon speech or ideas represent tyranny. There is absolutely no such thing as “treasonous” or “politically correct” speech. No one has a right not to be offended by ideas.

IV. I understand that the government’s only legitimate use of military force is to protect its citizens from foreign invasion.

V. I understand that the government’s only legitimate use of police force is to protect citizens from crimes of violence or theft.

VI. I understand that the government exists to serve the people—not the other way around.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tight budgets and fewer cops; time for citizens to ‘arm up’

Posted in Sound Off Soapbox by R Lee Wrights on July 22nd, 2010

by Alan Gottlieb and Dave Workman

Plunging government revenues may have the unintended consequence - so far as tax-and-spend (and spend some more) public officials are concerned - of reminding people that we are ultimately responsible for our own safety.

The pie plate is empty and inevitable cutbacks in important public services, including law enforcement, are on the horizon. It is already happening in Oakland, CA where the police chief has announced that officers will no longer respond to a broad list of crimes, if department layoffs go as planned.

What’s a citizen to do? Perhaps they will follow the advice of Ashtabula County, OH Judge Alfred Mackey and Hudspeth County, TX Sheriff Arvin West. In the past few months, both have advised their neighbors to arm themselves.

Said the judge, according to a report on WKYC back in April, “Be very careful, be vigilant, get in touch with your neighbors, because we’re going to have to look after each other.”

Oakland Police Chief Anthony Batts is no less a victim of government spending out of control than, say, King County, WA Sheriff Sue Rahr. She is appealing to voters to approve a small sales tax hike to pay for sheriff’s department services, and maintain the county prosecutor’s office. It will likely be rejected. Last year, Rahr advised county residents during a series of public meetings on public safety that, faced with the possibility of a burglary or home invasion, or some other crime and the nearest deputy being several minutes away, she would “have a gun.”

Read the rest of this entry »


« Previous entries