Archive for February, 2010

Let the free market be free

Posted in Liberty's Lessons by R Lee Wrights on February 28th, 2010

by John Stossel

The Internet has revolutionized the marketplace by, among other things, eliminating middlemen.

Internet car-buying services let you shop for prices and options without leaving home. “For sale by owner” websites show you houses for sale.

Uh oh. Can’t have that, can we?

In a truly free market, businesses can’t kill competition, because they can’t use force. Unfortunately, in our “mixed economy,” they can get their friends in politics to use force to stifle competition.

Adam Smith saw it all the way back in 1776. In “The Wealth of Nations,” he wrote, “People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.” He advised that any legislation such a group proposed “ought always to be listened to with great precaution.” Detroit and its dealers wield enough influence in state capitals to make direct sales of cars on the Internet illegal everywhere but Alaska. Every year the automotive industry spends millions of dollars fighting government regulation, but when it can use government for its own ends, it does.

Read the rest of this entry »

We already know the solution

Posted in Freedom's Flame by R Lee Wrights on February 27th, 2010

by Scott Williamson

Take a look at our Party’s web page.  At the top, like a bright marquee, we proudly announce our philosophy to all those who visit our site. It is simple. It is easy to remember. It is easy to understand. Smaller government. More freedom. We believe that when you give individuals liberty and responsibility for their own life the world is a safer and freer place to live. The best way to prove our philosophy works is when we use it and show it works.

As we get closer to our National Convention many of the liberty blogs are filled with debate and ideas for the growth of our party. While it is healthy and productive for a party to examine its direction, the solution to our problems is really as simple as our philosophy. Because the solution to the problems our party faces is our philosophy. Smaller government. More freedom.

How do we solve the problem of a shrinking membership? Smaller government. More freedom. Our national party will grow when the local party’s grow. The best way to encourage local growth is for our national party to provide the tools (brochures, advertisement, etc) and then get out of the way. Our national party should serve the state and local parties, not the other way around.

Read the rest of this entry »

The village raising your children

Posted in LFA Flashback by R Lee Wrights on February 26th, 2010

by Rachel Mills

Rachel MillsI won’t be writing on drama ripped from the headlines this week. I will be writing on the drama silenced under terrifying government bureaucracy and elaborate funding schemes. It’s not in the news. It should be.

Being Libertarian, I feel especially sorry for children raised by the government I try to avoid. They are helpless, at the mercy of that heartless maze of red tape. Wouldn’t it be great to help them out? In planning for my future family, I had long thought it would be quite noble (not to mention less painful, and better for my girlish figure) to become a foster/adoptive parent in lieu of birthing my own babies. I don’t know nuthin…

My husband had reservations about such a plan. Raising kids for the state? At the whim of the state? To be taken back at any time by the state? After more research, I am horrified at what we would have become for the state had we placed ourselves in that position.

Yes, there is an elaborate funding scheme that has broken many families called the Adoption and Safe Families Act, of 1997, a baby of Hillary’s. Sounds so positive on the face of it, as do many do-gooder social engineering bills. We want to create an incentive to place kids “languishing” in foster homes in permanent forever families. So we will give “adoption bonuses” in the form of large grants to states that improve their adoption statistics. In 2002 nearly $15 million was doled out for this program, ($82 million since the start) which works out to between $4,000 and $6,000 in bonus money per child placed into an adoptive home.

Read the rest of this entry »

Census confidentiality? The check is in the mail

Posted in Back Door Politics by R Lee Wrights on February 25th, 2010

by Dave Kopel

Some promises shouldn’t be taken seriously. “The check is in the mail,” or “Of course I’ll respect you in the morning,” or “I won’t raise taxes.” To that list should be added, “Your answers to census questions will remain completely confidential.”

Already this census season, many of homeless people have refused to divulge personal information to census takers. Some of the homeless have fears that their personal plight will be revealed to far-away relatives. That intuitive distrust of the Census Bureau may be valid.

During the 1940 census, American citizens of Japanese descent dutifully noted their forebears’ ethnicity on the census form. Those Japanese-Americans believed the Census Bureau assurance that their answers would remain secret. But in 1942 the federal government began rounding up citizens who were of Japanese descent and imprisoning them in concentration camps. How did the Justice Department know where to find Japanese-Americans? The Census Bureau told them.

The bureau kept its promise of confidentiality, it never disclosed any individual’s name and address. Instead, the bureau told the Justice Department’s concentration camp office when census tracts (small neighborhoods) had high proportions of citizens with Japanese ancestry. Knowing which neighborhoods to concentrate on, the concentration camp officials descended for house-to-house searches.

Read the rest of this entry »

What my friends and I did for Massachusetts Libertarians

Posted in Stand Up For Liberty by R Lee Wrights on February 24th, 2010

by George Phillies

How LAMA has changed since the 2006 State Convention - and all for the better.

In 2006, the Libertarian Association of Massachusetts was in sufficient straits that its regular yearly convention, which should have been called for April, did not occur.  The State Committee had not met for three-quarters of a year.  Finally, in May the outbound State Chair to his great credit asked Carol McMahon and I to organize and hold the next State Convention, which due to Bylaws constraints could be held no earlier than September.

We held the Convention, an almost entirely new State Committee being elected.   Carol and I were re-elected.

There then followed a prolonged period of trying to sort out all sorts of issues.  Many of these took quite some time to fix, in some cases much longer than you would think necessary.

There are some useful lessons here. In an all-volunteer organization, sometimes you can replace your procedures.  Sometimes you have to replace the people instead.  Fixing a group will not happen overnight. However, it can be done.  You do need a few things.  You need people willing to do work. You need to be fairly vigorous about not listening to the voices who say ‘we can’t’.

Read the rest of this entry »

Hot air

Posted in Tuma's Toons by R Lee Wrights on February 23rd, 2010

by Kevin Tuma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read the rest of this entry »

The Libertarian National Committee: Who’s with whom? Who’s against whom?

Posted in LNC Reports by R Lee Wrights on February 22nd, 2010

by James R. Oaksun

This coming weekend - February 26 to 28  — a Libertarian Party state leaders conference is being held in Austin, Texas.  Libertarian activists from across the country will get together, share ideas, and network.  On Saturday night, there will be a debate among the four declared candidates for LNC Chair.  Sunday, the National Committee will have a regular meeting.

(Some subtle (and perhaps not-so-subtle) campaigning for other LNC positions will also take place, in all likelihood.)

In preparation for the conference and to help me and perhaps others sort out the current situation on the committee, I have analyzed all the LNC’s recorded votes since the Denver convention.  The end result of the analysis is a schematic that illustrates the coalitions on the committee - who is with whom, and who is against whom.

The source for the analysis is the posted minutes of the LNC meetings, from the lp.org website.  I was not present at the meetings and relied solely on the formal textual record.

In addition, I only included votes where there was a stated division - where I could determine who voted yes/no/present.  The committee took several voice votes through the period, where the record simply indicated “measure passed” or “measure failed”.  I excluded those.

Read the rest of this entry »

Without taxes, how would we get the poor to subsidize the rich?

Posted in Liberty's Lessons by R Lee Wrights on February 21st, 2010

by Tessa Rose

I frequently come up against the accusation that, because I don’t approve of taxation, I don’t care about the poor. In many minds, paying taxes to a ruling elite equates with helping the less fortunate and supporting society. But take a look at the U.S. Debt Clock. So far this year, this country’s ruling elite has spent $500 billion on war, $300 billion on interest to the Federal Reserve; $50 billion on subsidies; and $1100 billion on big-business bailouts. Is it just me, or does this look rather like slaughtering the poor and enriching the very rich?

Let’s look at a smaller example that’s closer to home. A few years ago, the government stole a lot of our money and imprisoned my husband for a year because we’d had the audacity to spend our money according to our personal values (like helping the poor and creating jobs) instead of contributing it to bloody mayhem and enrichment of the already rich. Since then we’ve been living on very little, due to a combination of the government’s past persecution and our own personal choices. While Larken devotes himself to fighting tyranny full time, I devote myself to homeschooling my daughter. Neither of these endeavors is very lucrative.

In short, we have a pitiful income. Recently, the amazingly generous people on Larken’s email list sent me lots of money as an anniversary gift. I was thrilled to have money to spend on homeschooling, and I spent a sizeable chunk of this windfall on things for my daughter’s education.

Read the rest of this entry »

Rest in peace, Mr. Stack

Posted in Liberty's Friend by R Lee Wrights on February 20th, 2010

by Larken Rose 

Earlier today, a victim of the largest extortion racket in the world struck back, giving up his life in the process. The control freaks, and their propagandists who pretend to be “reporters,” will no doubt spend the next few weeks demonizing the man, or painting him as crazy. You can decide for yourself if this was the case. As best I can tell, today Joseph Stack burned down his house, and then crashed his plane into the Austin, Texas offices of the IRS. We don’t need to ponder the reason, because he told us why, in a suicide note, which can be read here.  

I found reading the note very disturbing, mainly because Mr. Stack was obviously far more intelligent, and more in touch with reality, than the vast majority of Americans. In other words, compared to the deluded masses of conformists, Mr. Stack was the sane one. Several statements in his suicide note show that he had overcome the authoritarian statist indoctrination far more than most people ever will. Does the following sentiment sound familiar?

“We are all taught as children that without laws there would be no society, only anarchy. Sadly, starting at early ages we in this country have been brainwashed to believe that, in return for our dedication and service, our government stands for justice for all. We are further brainwashed to believe that there is freedom in this place … I have spent the total years of my adulthood unlearning that crap from only a few years of my childhood.” [Joseph Stack, 2/18/2010]

Read the rest of this entry »

Is Canada going to pot?

Posted in LFA Flashback by R Lee Wrights on February 19th, 2010

by Alvin Anders

Al AndersRecently, several Canadian judges have ruled that simple possession of marijuana is no longer a crime.  What has caused this turn of events?  Why it’s medical marijuana.  It seems that Canadian judges find it unconstitutional for marijuana to be legal as medicine and then force the sick to resort to the black market for their medicine.  In the US, nine states have passed laws allowing the medical use of marijuana but only California allows patient access to their medicine without resorting to the black market.  Sure in all nine states, patients can grow their own medicine (and wait four months for harvest), except buying and selling the seeds are illegal in eight of them.  And if the patient or their caregiver buys seeds from Canada or other countries selling them, they violate another law if they ask the US Postal Service to deliver them.

So what is the US government’s response to the legalization of personal possession in Canada?  Well if Canada legalizes personal possession, then goods coming across the Canadian border will have to really, really be inspected.  We can’t have Canadian marijuana being smuggled into the US.

Of course I’m a little confused by this response.  Aren’t we already really, really searching goods coming across the border to minimize the treat of terrorism?  Am I to understand that the threat of weapons of mass destruction sneaking across the border doesn’t rate the level of scrutiny that the possibility of marijuana being smuggled across does?

Read the rest of this entry »


« Previous entries