Archive for November, 2009

Mrs. Obama, what about our boys?

Posted in Liberated Musings by R Lee Wrights on November 30th, 2009

by Jessica Peck Corry

As Michelle Obama touched down in Denver today to promote her efforts to connect America’s public school students with professional mentors, she declined to send an invitation to one population who could most benefit: our city’s neglected boys.

The First Lady’s packed schedule started with a closed “girls mentoring luncheon” at the Governor’s Mansion on Logan Street. Next, she’ll gather with other state and national figures in meeting with female students from area schools. The high profile list of mentors included actresses Susan Sarandon and Fran Drescher. Also taking part are beltway heavy hitters, including Labor secretary Hilda Solis, Health and Human Services secretary Kathleen Sebelius, and Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lisa Jackson.

The visit comes just days after Obama hosted a “Women of Excellence” outreach event at the White House, where 20 girls were paired with 20 mentors, and participants were treated to appearances by singers Sheryl Crow and Alicia Keys. Obama says she hopes to provide successful female role models to a greater number of students. As the Denver Post reported Friday, “During the launch of the program at the White House 10 days ago, Michelle Obama told the students she felt it important they have mentors who could help them and listen to their concerns.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Supreme Court opinions v the inherent, inalienable rights of man

Posted in Of The People by R Lee Wrights on November 29th, 2009

by Ed Lewis

To take as fact opinions uttered by those feathering their own nests and/or the nests of their fellow comrades against the people is a grave error.  Avoiding such errors requires vigilance and knowledge, neither one of which one is likely to acquire from mainstream media, public “education”, and officials dedicated to masters determined to take the people’s property, all the while treating our people as less than human.

Thus, let us examine a few facts that are easily verifiable.

First, Supreme Court justices state opinions, not Law.  The decisions reached are nothing more than the side of the controversy with the most “like” opinions determining the decision.  In other words, if five justices agree with one side of the controversy and four dissent, then the opinion of the five determines the decision.

Read the rest of this entry »

How serious is the Libertarian Party about being taken seriously?

Posted in Rhys' Rants by R Lee Wrights on November 28th, 2009

by Rhys M. Blavier

When I was 20 years old and preparing to vote in my first Presidential election, a man came to speak on the campus of Texas A&M University about his new party and his campaign for the Presidency. That man was Ed Clark, the first Libertarian candidate on the ballots of all 50 states. He spoke of a vision of government which combined fiscal responsibility with social humanism.

Ed Clark made such an impact on my personal view of politics that now, 30 years later, I still call myself an Ed Clark Libertarian. Unfortunately, since then I have watched the Libertarian Party move to the far-right with no coherent message to the point where, instead of creating a viable third party in American politics, it has become seen a ‘lunatic fringe’ of the extreme far-right, religious conservative wing of the Republican Party, a neo-Republican Party, if you will. After 30 years, it has still never made a serious impact on American politics at either the national or even the state level. The fault is our own but, I personally believe that could be realistically changed… starting with the 2010 elections.

Read the rest of this entry »

Patriotism versus nationalism

Posted in LFA Flashback by R Lee Wrights on November 27th, 2009

by R. Lee Wrights

“If a person is decent and a pro-government American patriot, he or she is not intelligent. If a person is intelligent and a pro-government American patriot, he or she is not decent. And if a person is decent and intelligent, he or she is not a pro-government American patriot.”

- William Blum, Killing Hope (1995)

After an article I wrote some time ago titled, “What’s Wrong with Patriotism,” it was brought to my attention, by the voluminous feedback I received, that people not only agreed with my thesis; but also, took the argument a step further. A distinction was made between patriotism and nationalism. They are very similar in nature but quite different as well. First of all being a patriot requires serious, analytical, rational thought. A nationalist, on the other hand, throws off the cloak of thought and wraps himself in a brightly-colored flag. He lets someone else do his thinking for him, always destined to be a follower of the leader du jour. A patriot will always question the “leader du jour” before he engages an enemy. A patriot does not charge blindly into battle without having become convinced that the cause for battle is a righteous, principled stand.

“Patriotism: a loyalty to the principles that one’s nation [was] founded on. Nationalism: a loyalty to a particular government.”

-Chris Snyder, Cosby, Tennessee

Read the rest of this entry »

Bon appetit

Posted in Tuma's Toons by R Lee Wrights on November 26th, 2009

by Kevin Tuma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read the rest of this entry »

Slimy politics help advance ObamaCare in the Senate

Posted in Back Door Politics by R Lee Wrights on November 25th, 2009

by GOA staff

By now, you have probably heard the bad news regarding Saturday night’s vote on the anti-gun ObamaCare bill.

Sixty Senators voted to bring the legislation to the Senate floor for discussion and debate, which means that rather than killing the bill outright, we must fight to defeat it another day.

Saturday’s vote was very, very important.  And every Senator who supported the legislation should be taken to the woodshed for casting an all-important vote in favor of the bill, at a time when we had the best chance to kill ObamaCare.

The good news is that we still hope to win our battle against ObamaCare, and we can do that because Saturday’s vote was not the only opportunity to filibuster the bill.  At least four Senators — who voted for ObamaCare on Saturday — have said they will support a filibuster if the bill stays in its current form.

Read the rest of this entry »

A libertarian for life: Mine and yours

Posted in The Freedom Beam by R Lee Wrights on November 24th, 2009

by Roderick T. Beaman

Like many other libertarians, I cut my ideologic teeth on William F. Buckley, Jr. and his National Review. I have always had a deep resentment for those who try to exercise their authority over me, whether some leech like bureaucrat or a local cop impressed with his own badge. As Ronald Reagan once observed, many an evening I spent with National Review (NR) on my lap and a dictionary on the floor next to my chair.

Through the 1950s and 60s, there was little other than National Review, at least that most of us could find, that presented libertarian thought. To be sure, National Review had a wide variety of conservatives on its masthead and among its guest writers. Later it would take to banning true libertarians such as Joseph Sobran and Murray Rothbard, but it still was the major vector for the dissemination of libertarian viewpoints.

I haven’t subscribed to NR for nearly twenty years. I’m not sure exactly what it was that caused my disillusionment with it. Perhaps it was the loss of the original writers but it might have been my increasing doubts about the perpetuation of our global intervention after the collapse of Soviet Socialism. After all, Buckley had once asserted in his famous (infamous?) 1969 NR essay, that we would have to accept some totalitarianism in the interim until the looming evil, Soviet Socialism, was defeated. Well, by 1989 it was defeated but the military-industrial complex, like all bureaucracies, found more reasons to exist, the new international enemy that had to be defeated, terrorism. That caused me to begin reassessing my views on foreign policy.

Read the rest of this entry »

Republicans continue their march toward death

Posted in Stand Up For Liberty by R Lee Wrights on November 23rd, 2009

by George Phillies 
 

There is some really good news out there politically.  America has a two-party electoral system, meaning that third parties such as ours have problems with winning elections.  Fortunately, the national Republican Party is preparing to get out of our way by committing political suicide and transforming itself into a regional party of eccentrics, namely the Party of Southern Sectarian Christian White Male Conservatives.  Liberal Democrats have proposed for them a new political mascot: GOPY the Gopasaurus, a red-white-and-blue dinosaur speeding to extinction.

In a certain sense, we are seeing the divergence of political opinions between different parts of the country that we have seen before.  This time, the differences with a few exceptions are less likely to lead to violence than they were in 1840 or 1850, but the divergences are still there.  One radical difference from 1850, from what we know of that distant time, is that in 2009 a major dividing line is generational more than geographical.  The people who support Republican social-conservative thinking against abortion and gay marriage, and for the war on drugs, are in substantial part an older generation that is preparing to depart this earth without being replaced, at least politically.

Read the rest of this entry »

Should we put God back in schools?

Posted in Student Union by R Lee Wrights on November 22nd, 2009

by Tessa Rose

This post is in response to a Facebook conversation resulting from the question: Should we put God back in Schools?

Okay, since people seem determined to address this question seriously, I will try to be serious myself, instead of just poking fun at the question itself.

It can be very hard to say which particular moves are better or worse within a political system as screwed up as this one is. Ideally, there would be no public schools, no taxes, no guys with guns taking kids away from their parents if they didn’t send them to school, and so on. As always, it’s impossible to predict the spontaneous order that would result from the free actions of millions of individuals, so I won’t even try to describe my own imaginings of what might come to be. Let’s just assume that parents would choose the education they thought best for their children (or children would choose…) within the means of their unexploited income. They would obviously choose to educate their children according to what they believe is true: their own worldview and their own values. To do otherwise is insane (unless you’re living under a regime so oppressive that will kill you if you express unapproved beliefs).

Read the rest of this entry »

Market driven health care saves lives

Posted in Liberty's Lessons by R Lee Wrights on November 21st, 2009

by Donald Beezley

Connor was so sick when my wife and I took him to the emergency room; lethargic and unresponsive. I remember someone saying it looked like [type 1] diabetes. We knew nothing about diabetes or the implications. We knew how bad it looked. As parents, we worried about worst-case scenarios.

After making it through ICU, a lot of tears and fears and a crash course in diabetes management, we took Connor home. He was only fifteen months old that day as he faced the future with a demanding, lifelong disease.

It’s been five years now.

One image I still recall so clearly from those first days is my little guy, holding out his tiny hand whenever I’d say, “it’s time for a test.” My wife or I would then prick his finger to check his blood sugar at least six times a day.

Connor’s little hand, held out his so innocently and trusting, was the great symbol of a struggle that was just beginning. He didn’t know his disease was a harsh task master that never sleeps and would be with him the rest of his life. Now six years old, he’s my hero for how he handles it. Only once or twice has he said, “Papa, sometimes I wish I didn’t have diabetes.”

Read the rest of this entry »


« Previous entries