Archive for August, 2009

Ain’t that America

Posted in Jefferson D.C. by R Lee Wrights on August 31st, 2009

by Peter Orvetti

Officer Wesley Cheeks, Jr., inadvertently revealed a sad truth during a confrontation with a peaceful demonstrator last Tuesday in Reston, Virginia.  The man was one of several holding up signs outside a town hall forum on health care hosted by Rep. James Moran.  Cheeks, a security officer employed by the public through the Fairfax County Public Schools, singled out this man because he did not like his sign.

Cheeks approached the demonstrator and told him to obscure the sign from view.  When the demonstrator asked why he was being singled out, Cheeks gave the dubious answer that it was because his sign had a picture on it.  Cheeks threatened the man with trespassing charges, and when the activist said he was engaged in legal protest, Cheeks replied, “I’ll charge you with whatever I want to charge you with.”

“This is America!  This used to be America!” the agitated demonstrator replied.  Then came Cheeks’s moment of truth.  “It ain’t no more, okay?”

Well, it’s not quite as bad as all that.  The demonstrations over the health care debate have been passionate and sometimes violent, but they have been happening.  Dissent has not been snuffed out.  But over the past decade, those in power have cynically abused the legitimate need for public safety and security in order to stifle opponents.

Read the rest of this entry »

Unlearned lesson of 9-11

Posted in Tuma's Toons by R Lee Wrights on August 30th, 2009

by Kevin Tuma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read the rest of this entry »

Violence by any other name…

Posted in Liberty's Friend by R Lee Wrights on August 29th, 2009

by Larken Rose

Whenever I speak of forcible resistance against “government,” some people respond with things like, “How can you be for violence?” And almost everyone who says that is both delusional and hypocritical.

I admit, compared to almost everyone else, my political views are very extreme. For example, I don’t advocate that anyone ever be forced to fund something that they don’t want to fund. I don’t support robbery, even when the stolen loot is to be used for something supposedly noble or beneficial. No Democrat or Republican can honestly say that. Though they differ on how the politicians should spend the loot, every single one of them advocates that I be robbed, under threat of violence, to pay for things that I don’t want. And, of course, they also advocate that you be robbed to pay for things that you don’t want.

I don’t. Ain’t I extreme?

The trouble is, even though every Republican and Democrat advocates the initiation of violence against millions of people who haven’t harmed anyone, the way people see reality is so warped by the “authority” myth that they can’t see that what they advocate is coercion. They think that calling it “law” or “taxation” somehow makes it legitimate and disqualifies it as violence. And yet they know that anyone who doesn’t pay the federal Mafia’s extortion fees will be punished, with either extra robbery or imprisonment (or death if they continue to resist). It’s not that they are unaware of the violence behind all “laws”; it’s that they think it’s automatically righteous when “government” does it, and so they don’t call it violence.

Read the rest of this entry »

You reap what you sow

Posted in LFA Flashback by R Lee Wrights on August 28th, 2009

by J. Michael Bragg

J. Michael BraggIn light of the shootings and violence in our schools and streets of this Great Nation

Dear God,

Why didn’t you save the little girl in Michigan?

Sincerely,

Concerned Student

 

AND THE REPLY…

Dear Concerned Student:

I am not allowed in schools.

Sincerely,

God.

Read the rest of this entry »

The epic myth of Libertarian slavery

Posted in Serious Levity by R Lee Wrights on August 27th, 2009

by Kevin Joseph Tull 

There is an idea among some opponents of Libertarianism that under a Libertarian system one can sell themselves into slavery. There are even some Libertarians who have a difficult time arguing against this concept as they see that by having property right over ones own body they can sell their body or parts thereof to others and once such a contract is agreed to by both parties no government interference can occur to break this contract. These Libertarians and their opponents can see that this would actually leave someone in a state of slavery even if they changed their minds about a contract of indentured servitude after it was signed. Sometimes the only Libertarian responses available to the ill informed activist are “It says in the platform we are against indentured servitude, so we are,” or even worse, “Well, if your stupid enough to enter into that kind of contract then I guess you get what you deserve.”

Opponents of Libertarianism claim that because a persons body is just another piece of property, as stated in our platform, then creditors could take possession of it as the last item of property a debtor owns.

From this point some of our opponents come up with bizarre fictionalized accounts of a leviathan corporate slave society where children of slaves are harvested to compete with free laborers and also harvested for body organs all to be traded as just another commodity.

Read the rest of this entry »

When free speech means life or death

Posted in Dangerous Politics by R Lee Wrights on August 26th, 2009

by Jessica Peck Corry

Free speech can be complicated, as evidenced by the call from U.S. Rep. Betsy Markey (D-Fort Collins) for “civility” in the passionate debate over President Barack Obama’s plan to socialize American health care.

At town hall meetings and through online campaigns, millions of Americans have expressed heated opposition to Obama’s proposal.

Markey, justifiably nervous about the response she’ll face at her own upcoming meetings, plans to provide attendees copies of George Washington’s “Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior in Company.”

The Denver Post’s Monte Whaley writes that “if voters angry over (Obama’s) attempts to overhaul the nation’s health care system don’t heed her plea, maybe they’ll listen to the father of our country.”

Markey emphasizes Washington’s first rule: “Every action done in company ought to be with some sign of respect to those that are present.” Markey implores participants to “respect one another. Don’t yell at people. Don’t hold a sign in front of someone’s face. You may not agree with what they say, but everybody deserves a right to speak.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Gun groups to sue over Montana-made and retained firearms

Posted in Press Releases by R Lee Wrights on August 25th, 2009

from SAF

BELLEVUE, WA - The Montana Shooting Sports Association (MSSA) and the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) have formed a strategic alliance to litigate the principles of the Montana Firearms Freedom Act (MFFA), passed by the 2009 Montana Legislature and signed into law by Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer.

The MFFA declares that any firearms made and retained in Montana are not subject to any federal authority, resisting Congress’s dramatically expanded use of the interstate commerce clause to justify Washington’s regulation of virtually all of the private economy.  The MFFA also applies to firearm accessories and ammunition.

MSSA is most well-known for advancing pro-gun and pro-hunting bills in the Montana Legislature, and has been successful with 54 pro-gun and pro-hunting measures in the past 25 years.  SAF is a pro-gun foundation in Bellevue, Washington, established to press the rights of gun owners primarily in judicial fora.  SAF has been a party to numerous lawsuits to assert the rights of gun owners across the Nation.

The primary purpose of the MFFA is to set up a legal challenge to federal power under the commerce clause.  MSSA and SAF expect to mount this legal challenge by filing a suit for a declaratory judgment to test the principles of the MFFA in federal court on October 1st, the day the Montana law becomes effective.

Read the rest of this entry »

Trillions and trillions

Posted in Jefferson D.C. by R Lee Wrights on August 24th, 2009

by Peter Orvetti

My sons, who will be five next month, have recently discovered mathematics.  They are learning their numbers, and are intrigued by the concepts of addition and subtraction.  They do, however, have a tendency to guess that 10 plus 12 is “forty hundred”, or to insist that there is a number called “seventeen eleven”.  (This has led me to question my competence as a homeschool dad.)

Even they, though, have a basic understanding of how money works.  When we are at the bookstore or the toy store, they know that they cannot buy a six-dollar item if they have just four dollars.  They also know that if they save their money wisely, they can afford even better things later on.

It would be nice if the government could learn this lesson, too.

It is overly simplistic to say that spending should never exceed income or saved wealth.  We buy houses and pay for college through big loans, since the costs often exceed regular income.  We also purchase cars and furniture and other products on pay-over-time, interest-based systems.  Similarly, governments must have the capacity to allocate funding for emergencies and major long-term projects.

Read the rest of this entry »

America’s real shadow government

Posted in Tuma's Toons by R Lee Wrights on August 23rd, 2009

by Kevin Tuma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read the rest of this entry »

Gun owners helped oust Seattle mayor

Posted in Doing Something by R Lee Wrights on August 22nd, 2009

by CCRKBA staff

Seattle gun owners can take much credit for the ouster of anti-gun Mayor Greg Nickels in this week’s primary election, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms said this morning following what amounted to a concession speech at his press conference.

Nickels came in third in the city’s “Top Two” primary, signaling that voters in Seattle were fed up with his bully pulpit style, and perhaps more than anything, his arrogance, said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb. No single episode has better underscored that haughtiness than the mayor’s open defiance of Washington State law that denied him the authority to set up the city’s own restrictive gun laws.

“When the mayor announced last year that he would ban legally-carried firearms from city property when he knew it would be contrary to the state’s preemption statute,” Gottlieb recalled, “it made tens of thousands of Seattle gun owners furious. Nickels insulted their intelligence by promising to ban guns by executive order, which is the height of municipal contempt for the rights of citizens under the state Constitution. He literally threw away their votes.”

CCRKBA Projects Director Thomas McKiddie, a West Seattle resident, said he and his gun-owning fellow Seattleites had simply had enough of the mayor’s condescension toward their rights to be safe on city streets, in parks and on other public property.

Read the rest of this entry »


« Previous entries