Archive for July, 2008

DC city council ignoring Supreme Court ruling: Discharge petition filed on gun ban repeal

Posted in Doing Something by R Lee Wrights on July 31st, 2008

by GOA staff

GOAIn open defiance of the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Washington D.C. gun control law, the City Council passed an “emergency” law that keeps in place almost all of the law that was ruled unconstitutional.

For example, though the Court ruled specifically that the city’s ban on handguns violated the Second Amendment, most handguns still cannot be registered because D.C. bureaucrats classify semi-automatic pistols as “machine guns.”

Even Dick Heller, who brought the case against Washington’s gun ban, was rejected when he tried to register his handgun because any “bottom loading” firearm is a “machine gun” according to the D.C. police.

Similarly, while the Court found that “the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a “trigger lock” is unconstitutional, the city kept in place the “lock up your safety” law unless the resident is in immediate danger.

The D.C. Council is thus rendering the Supreme Court victory for gun rights meaningless, while leaving residents defenseless.

Read the rest of this entry »

Restraining orders can be straitjackets on justice

Posted in Liberated Musings by R Lee Wrights on July 30th, 2008

by Mike McCormick and Glenn Sacks

Glenn SacksWomen’s advocates and the state Attorney General’s office are criticizing a new court ruling which will make it harder for women to get restraining orders against their male partners. Star-Ledger columnist Fran Wood, in her recent op-ed “Don’t soften protection for women,” called New Jersey’s Domestic Violence Prevention Act “one of the best statutes in the country,” and said the new ruling could “diminish the ability of domestic violence victims to get the protection they need.”

Certainly abused women need protection and support, but there are many troubling aspects of the DVPA’s restraining order provisions that merit judicial and/or legislative redress.

Under the DVPA, it is very easy for a woman to allege domestic violence and get a restraining order (aka “protection order”). New Jersey issues 30,000 restraining orders annually, and men are targeted in 4/5ths of them. The standard is “preponderance of the evidence” (often conceptualized as 51%-49%), and judges almost always side with the accusing plaintiff.

Under the DVPA, the accuser need not even claim actual abuse. Alleged verbal threats of violence are sufficient, even though it’s almost impossible for the accused to provide substantive contradictory evidence.

Read the rest of this entry »

Wilmette trustees acted properly in repealing handgun ban

Posted in Power to the People by R Lee Wrights on July 29th, 2008

by CCRKBA staff

Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear ArmsThe Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms said today that the decision by officials in Wilmette, IL to repeal their 19-year-old handgun ban is “a victory of substance over symbolism.”

CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb said the 1989 ban - made infamous five years ago when Wilmette homeowner Hale DeMar shot a career criminal in the act of burglarizing DeMar’s home for the second night in a row - has never shown that it had any impact on violent crime.

“It appears the only people affected by the ban were law-abiding citizens like DeMar who were ensnared by the ordinance for having guns that suddenly became illegal,” Gottlieb observed. “Repealing the ban makes sense because the ordinance was grounded in nonsense.”

Wilmette Village President Chris Canning was quoted by a local newspaper noting that “I think the strongest option that would give a clean slate to the whole situation would be to repeal the ordinance.”

“What about cleaning the slate for any otherwise law-abiding citizen who was convicted and fined under the provisions of this Draconian ordinance,” Gottlieb questioned. “Any such persons should have their records cleared and their fines returned.

Read the rest of this entry »

So, you think cops are your friends

Posted in Of The People by R Lee Wrights on July 28th, 2008

by Ed Lewis

courtesy of Kevin TumaYou might even think they exist to protect you and your inherent, unalienable rights, that their primary goal is to uphold the Constitution for these united states of America.

Boy, are you in for a rude awakening.

Once upon a time in the real America, that America left us by our forefathers, we had what were called “peace officers”.  Never did they violate rights, as their job was to maintain the peace.

Their authority came from the people, and they would never consider breaking down one’s door, or even going on one’s property without permission from the owner.  Why is that?

Well, private property is not and has never been constitutionally under the regulatory authority of any government.  We people, you see, can only give the authority we have to give.

You do not have the right to interfere with others and their private property.  Therefore, you and the whole of the population that are by “our Law” on equal status with one another - members of the sovereignty - haven’t the authority to delegate authority we do not have.

Read the rest of this entry »

Democrats in Republican suits

Posted in Carolinus by R Lee Wrights on July 27th, 2008

by R. Lee Wrights

R. Lee WrightsWho was it that actually said, “Politics makes strange bedfellows?”  Furthermore, could there be a better example of the adage than the political day in which we live?  I can’t image how.  The transition of a political party has unfolded before our very eyes; and unfortunately, it plays before the international audience as an ancient Greek tragedy upon the stage of American politics.

Of course, what is even more unfortunate than the theatrical debut of the epic Death of Principles, is that it is not just some three-week run amateur show in your local “Little Theater,” it is in fact quite real.  Each act building one upon the other with a climax in the final scene that reveals the moral to the plot.  The President’s most recent State of the Union address before the American people has become the final act of a long and tragic drama.  Now it can be openly proclaimed that the GOP has become nothing more than Democrats in Republican suits.  I will gladly state my case.

One of the Democrats most effective political tools of the last century was mass fear.  They made our parents and grandparents doubt whether they were able to educate their children properly; and, they became so afraid that they handed us over to the State gladly, relieved that the worry of an uncertain future for us had been removed by a benevolent government. Democrats approach the destruction of our sacred Second Amendment in the same way.  They use the misinformation spawn from skewed statistics sired by slanted science to alarm people enough to convince many of them that the only way they can be safe is to give up their guns.  The President has now stooped to this level in his quest for world domination and cheaper crude.

Read the rest of this entry »

National Park Service gun ban expanding

Posted in Doing Something by R Lee Wrights on July 26th, 2008

by GOA staff

GOA600-mile Trail to be added to NPS

On July 10, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to designate the Washington-Rochambeau Trail, which stretches 600 miles from Rhode Island to Yorktown, Virginia, as a National Historic Trail. Such a designation would place the trail under the jurisdiction of the Department of Interior and the National Park Service, thus subjecting the Washington-Rochambeau to the current NPS gun ban.

Carrying firearms on land controlled by the NPS is prohibited, even if the state in which the land is located allows firearms. The only way you can legally have a firearm anywhere on National Park land currently is by having it unloaded and inaccessible, such as locked up in your trunk.

While the Interior Department recently (after seven years of foot-dragging) proposed new rules to partially reverse the gun ban, they have not yet taken effect. If and when they do go into effect, most gun owners would still not be allowed to possess firearms on these lands because, among other problems with the rule, open carry would remain prohibited. Congress still needs to take action to make the gun ban repeal complete and permanent.

Before the bill passed the House, Rep. Rob Bishop (R-UT) filed an amendment with the Rules Committee to protect the Second Amendment on the trail. His amendment would have required that state and local laws govern firearms possession and carrying on the trail. The Rules Committee changed that language and made it apply only to hunting.

Read the rest of this entry »

Letter to the editor of Roll Call

Posted in LFA Flashback by R Lee Wrights on July 25th, 2008

by James Bopp, Jr.

Lady LibertyEmboldened by a Supreme Court victory in McConnell v. FEC, upholding nearly every McCain-Feingold amendment to the Federal Election Campaign Act, the “reform” industry seeks to trick Republicans into supporting further restrictions on advocacy group participation in our democracy.  The purported targets of these new restrictions are newly created section 527 groups, America Coming Together and the Media Fund, whose announced purpose is defeating President Bush.  Republicans should not take this bait.

The “reform” groups’ argument is that these groups are “circumventing” McCain-Feingold by “attempting to replace political parties” by spending “soft money” on “federal election activities” that political parties may not do under McCain-Feingold.  The “reformers” would force these groups to register as political action committees and want them fined and punished.  The FEC has responded by considering new regulations and is considering several advisory opinion requests on this subject.

Republicans appear to be nibbling at this bait.  Republican FEC Commissioner Michael Toner recently published a Roll Call letter expressing concern that “outside tax-exempt groups are seeking to essentially replicate, with soft-money funds, much of the issue advertising and voter-mobilization activities that the national parties financed with soft-money funds before the new law was passed.”  The Republican National Committee filed FEC comments arguing that the political party restrictions on “federal election activities” should “be applied across the board.”

The FEC’s General Counsel has now weighed in, arguing in a draft advisory opinion to be considered February 5th that “federal election activities” should be “the benchmark” for determining whether a citizens group is a political action committee.

Read the rest of this entry »

Proud to be stupid?

Posted in Liberty Rant by R Lee Wrights on July 24th, 2008

by Larken Rose

Gadsden FlagAs you may have heard by now, at some meeting about traffic tickets, some bureaucrat commented that it was like the tickets were disappearing into a “black hole.” Well, a moron with no grip on reality took offense at that. Why? Because he decided it was a racist comment. And it made national news.

So are black people thin-skinned idiots?

Based upon those who pretend to be fighting for the interests of black people, that’s a good question. If Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, and all the other poverty pimps really do represent the black race, then most black people ARE stupid, and are also thin- skinned wimps. In fact, the most offensive thing you could possibly say about black people is that they are accurately represented by jackasses like the buffoon who got offended at the term “black hole.” (Coming in in second place would have to be the other moron who, a while back, was offended at someone using the term “niggardly”–another term having nothing to do with race.) Is this the type of greatness that blacks are supposed to have “pride” in? Why is it not okay to respond to such whining with, “YOU’RE AN IDIOT!!”? Might the National Association for the Advancement of Idiots be offended?

Black is a color–or rather, a lack of color. It is the absence of light. If, for example, someone has such a skin pigment that little light is reflected, and most is absorbed, it can appear almost black. As it happens, a lack of light also often has negative connotations, and that was true since long before any white people ever met any black people. The saying “This is a dark day in history” did not mean “This is a negro day.” And “This will be a black mark on your record,” didn’t mean “This will be a negro mark on your record.” Maybe I should go sue someone who uses the term “white noise” to mean irritating static on TV, or “whitewash” meaning to the covering up of something nasty.

Read the rest of this entry »

SAF and Smith & Wesson partner on commemorative revolver

Posted in Press Releases by R Lee Wrights on July 23rd, 2008

from SAF

SAFEngraved Model 442 Will Recognize District of Columbia vs. Heller Decision

SPRINGFIELD, Mass. - The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and Smith & Wesson have partnered to create a commemorative revolver designed to recognize the historical significance of the District of Columbia vs. Heller decision and to acknowledge the six original plaintiffs that united to challenge the gun ban in Washington, D.C.

As part of the project, an engraved Smith & Wesson Model 442 revolver will be presented to each of the six plaintiffs - Shelly Parker, Tom Palmer, Gillian St. Lawrence, Tracey Ambeau, George Lyon and Dick Heller - for their key roles in working to protect the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Smith & Wesson will make the commemorative revolver available for consumer purchase in Fall 2008 and will direct a portion of the proceeds to the Second Amendment Foundation to acknowledge the organization’s pivotal role in the Heller case and its ongoing efforts to preserve the Second Amendment rights of U.S. citizens.

“We are proud to work with Smith & Wesson on this project,” said Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation. “June 26 saw a landmark victory for the Second Amendment, and for all Americans. This is a fitting way to commemorate a significant moment in history, and support future efforts that will continue to strengthen our constitutional rights.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Government bailout redistributes wealth from poor to rich

Posted in Liberty's Friend by R Lee Wrights on July 22nd, 2008

by Mary J. Ruwart, Ph.D.

When President Bush promised to prop up the failing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, he authorized a transfer of wealth from those who live from paycheck to paycheck to those who have enough money to play the stock market. These lending institutions are owned by stockholders, who saw their shares plummet to lows of 6.7 and 5.0 respectively before they were promised taxpayer bailout.  After Bush’s announcement, the stocks recovered to 13.4 and 9.2 respectively, making over 100% profit for speculators and saving investors from further stock free-fall.

Instead of investors losing most of what they paid for their stock, you and I will pick up the tab. The promised bailout has to come from our pockets, because we are the government’s only source of income.  Government must tax us or create inflation by borrowing (the most likely scenario).  The buying power of our savings and paychecks will plummet.  People on fixed incomes (e.g., seniors) will be hurt the most.

How much will the bailout cost us?  It depends upon how many mortgage holders default.  If everyone did, which is unlikely, we could be looking at $5 trillion.   When you consider that the national debt is $9.6 trillion, you can see that this bailout could, in the worst case scenario, cost us about a third of our buying power.

That may only be the beginning, however.  Reassured that they won’t be punished for risky investments, management will make the sub-standard loans that got them into trouble in the first place.  In several years, we’ll get to do this again! Where will it stop?  It won’t!  Other lending institutions will want the same subsidies—at our expense.

Read the rest of this entry »


« Previous entries