Archive for March, 2008

A conservative, a libertarian, and two beers

Posted in Liberty's Friend by R Lee Wrights on March 31st, 2008

by Jessica Peck Corry

Jessica Peck CorryLast night in a crowded bar in Denver, an unlikely thing happened. A leading conservative sat down with a libertarian Republican to begin building a bridge toward a united future.

The duo, Jim Pfaff and Sean Duffy, represented opposite ends of the debate on one of 2006’s most contentious ballot issues - the ill-fated Referendum I that sought to strengthen legal rights and protections for same-sex partners. Duffy was the public relations guru behind the campaign, representing lead backer and libertarian Democratic millionaire Tim Gill. Pfaff, president and CEO of the Colorado Family Institute, served as the effort’s lead opponent.

Duffy calls himself a “pro-life, pro-gay” Republican, jokingly claiming that he’s been kicked out of the Republican Party multiple times only to come back for more abuse. You may remember him as the right-hand man of former Gov. Bill Owens, a conservative Republican. “At the end of the day, as Republicans, we should all just want the government to leave us alone,” he told me.

And Pfaff, while frequently identified by his ties to Focus On The Family’s Dr. James Dobson and his commitment to “life” issues, says he wants to work with Duffy and other libertarian Republicans to begin rebuilding the Republican Party in the West after years of Democratic gains. In the last few years alone, five traditionally Republican Western states have elected Democratic governors. Pfaff is passionately eager to work through differences because he says he wouldn’t want to live in a pro-life socialist America. Socialism, he says, ultimately leads to a loss of all freedoms.

Read the rest of this entry »

Citizens’ group calls for independent investigation of in-flight mishap to prevent cover-up

Posted in Sound Off Soapbox by R Lee Wrights on March 31st, 2008

by CCRKBA staff

Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear ArmsThe Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms today is calling for an independent investigation of an in-flight discharge of a pistol carried by an armed U.S. Airways pilot to prevent any whitewashing, cover-up or scapegoating in the incident.

CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb said the incident is alarming because of allegations that the pilot may have been following strict Transportation Security Administration (TSA) rules when the mishap occurred. Those rules came under fire today from the Airline Pilots Security Alliance (APSA), which represents thousands of commercial airline pilots.

“We have a keen interest in this case because we were first to demand that airline pilots be allowed to carry sidearms in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attack,” Gottlieb stated. “We called for that measure just hours after four terrorist-commandeered jets hurtled out of the sky, killing thousands of Americans in New York, Washington, DC and a Pennsylvania field on that horrible day in 2001, and that must never happen again.

“But from the outset,” he continued, “TSA officials resisted the Federal Flight Deck Officers (FFDO) program, with bureaucratic red tape and requirements that defy logic in terms of recruiting as many pilots as possible. Rules and red tape actually discouraged would-be volunteers. Professional pilots who are trusted to safely fly millions of passengers across our skies should be just as trustworthy to defend their aircraft from takeover. This incident could be used to erode public support for the FFDO program, which would be insane. There may or may not be an armed Federal Air Marshal aboard an airplane, but you are guaranteed there is a pilot on board.

Read the rest of this entry »

Abracadabra

Posted in Liberty's Voice by R Lee Wrights on March 30th, 2008

by Della Croft

Della CroftTragedy struck here in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania this week when one Joann Zansky was cheated out of $5400.00.  The trouble began when Ms. Zansky complained to her psychic that she was overcome with bad feelings.  The psychic prescribed three magic wands at a price of $1800.00 each.  These wands were guaranteed to remove bad feelings.  Two weeks after purchasing the wands, Ms. Zansky found that the bad feelings not only remained, but also began to think she may have been swindled.  She promptly contacted the Bethlehem police department and spoke to Lt. Robert Righi who thinks this may possibly be an act of consumer fraud.  I definitely think the police should be involved in this case.  I think they should arrest Ms. Zansky for stupidity.

I have no doubt that this case will make it to court.  I believe it will be on the docket along with the people suing McDonalds for making them fat and the smokers with lung cancer who now want to blame everyone else for their own stupid choices. Come on - there are laws against every other damn thing in this country, it’s about time we start a war on stupidity.   Wow, talk about your overcrowded prisons.

I think I may be able to help Ms. Zansky find a buyer for those magic wands.  If there is anyone in need of some magic, it’s got to be our own George W. Bush.  With thousands of American troops in position and poised for war, Mr. Bush has yet to produce one real shred of evidence to support his claims against Iraq.  Mysterious, top-secret evidence is just plain old-fashioned bullshit, George.  If you really do have evidence, pull it out and present it to us. When the friends of Iraq decide to launch the counter offensive on American soil, we don’t have a big, thick-walled bunker to hide in, so stop the double speak - produce your evidence and let us decide for ourselves.

Read the rest of this entry »

Criminalizing thought

Posted in Liberty Points by R Lee Wrights on March 29th, 2008

by Brian Irving

Brian Irving“Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions.”

- Justice William O. Douglas

Archie Bunker, where are you now that we need you? Archie (Carrol O’Connor) was the central character in the 1970’s blockbuster TV series “All in the Family.” He was a lovable bigot, if such a thing is possible. Just about every religious, racial and ethic slur imaginable came out of his mouth. He called his wife “Dingbat” and his liberal college-student son-in-law “Meathead.” The verbal exchanges between the two were classic, as were the sparring with Archie’s equally bigoted Black neighbor, George Jefferson.

The epithets spewing from his mouth - Fag, Spic, Dago, Wop, Polak, Chink, Spade - had never before been heard on television. I don’t recall ever hearing the infamous “N” word, however. That was a line even the daring producers were afraid to cross.

We all laughed at — and with — Archie.

Read the rest of this entry »

Government-mandated cell phone etiquette?

Posted in LFA Flashback by R Lee Wrights on March 28th, 2008

by Geoffrey Neale

Geoffrey NealeMove over, Miss Manners, politicians want to start correcting people’s rude behavior - at least when it comes to talking on a cell phone.

In New York, the City Council is considering the nation’s first law banning cell phone calls during indoor performances such as movies, concerts and Broadway plays. Call it cell phone etiquette for the chattering class.

The measure, expected to be approved in December, would impose a $50 fine on anyone who uses a cell phone - or fails to turn off the ringer.

And this law may be coming soon to a theater near you. Last year, after New York became the first state to ban using a cell phone while driving, 31 other state legislatures considered similar regulations. It may be only a matter of time before a wave of new cell phone regulations starts cascading across the country.

Read the rest of this entry »

Mark Lerner is going to stop the Real ID … now

Posted in Walking Towards Liberty by R Lee Wrights on March 27th, 2008

by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

Melinda Pillsbury-FosterMark Lerner is on the road nearly every moment he can find the money. His time is spent in appointments with legislators, sitting down with them to discuss the Real ID. When Mark starts talking they are polite, but not particularly interested. They think they know what the Real ID is about. But when Mark is finished they are worried and asking questions. Mark is the whistle-blower who brought the fraud by biometrics companies to the attention of the Securities and Exchange Commission only to be ignored for nearly two years before he went public. The silence from the SEC continues today. Mark is no longer silent. He is desperate to stop the Real ID because its implementation will hand over the most personal information and the biometrics of all Americans to the use of corporations and governments globally.

Americans have no idea what they are facing. Mark is determined that they be awakened to the their danger. The danger lies deep in plans long in place, from such innocuous agencies such as American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators, AAMVA currently has an alliance called the DLC (Driver’s License Compact) All but a few states belong to it. AAMVA recently forged a new alliance called the DLA, (Driver’s License Agreement) Under the section entitled, “Jurisdiction,” within the DLA, it states that the United States, Mexico and Canada, will be under one umbrella of jurisdiction to share citizen’s of each country’s information contained in DMV data bases.

The Department of Homeland Security calls the AAMVA and its network, referred to as AamvaNet, the “Backbone of the Real ID Act,” meaning it is the essential system that will allow data bases to be connected and information shared. That includes all information garnered about Americans from all sources. AAMVA has introduced a new alliance between states and territories and countries. Those countries are the United States, Canada and Mexico. This is the precursor, what is needed, for the establishment of the North America Union, the Security and Prosperity Partnership.

Read the rest of this entry »

Losing faith?

Posted in Random Thoughts by R Lee Wrights on March 27th, 2008

by Frank Worley

courtesy of Kevin TumaA number of politicians have recently said publicly that if government doesn’t tackle this issue or other, the American people will “lose faith” in the system. A number of times it has been used to refer to San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsome’s decision to allow gay marriages. The law, whether it is right or wrong, must be enforced. If not, the people will loose “faith” in the system.

Ok, what is wrong with this picture?

In most U.S. elections, especially in the so called, “off year” elections, about half of the people don’t vote. Why do you presume that is? Could it be they’ve “lost faith”? Oh horrors.

I first lost faith when I heard a national news story, (its been so long I can’t remember which) run a piece on a “study” that indicated orange juice could cause cancer. I was pretty young at the time, but it still rubbed me the wrong way. After that, I found out that many “studies” reported on in the national news are actually well written “surveys” not real double blind, follow the rules of science, research projects.

Read the rest of this entry »

There are no magic cures

Posted in Stand Up For Liberty by R Lee Wrights on March 26th, 2008

by Phillies campaign staff

George PhilliesLibertarian Presidential candidate George Phillies today urged simple steps to reduce the cost of medical insurance.  “There are no magic cures,” Phillies said. “I am proposing Libertarian improvements in our medical care system.  These are changes Americans will actually accept and implement now. Once Americans see these changes work, they will be more ready to trust more radical Libertarian proposals.

“First, transfer costs should be eliminated.  Right now, anyone who comes to a hospital emergency room gets free care even if they don’t have health insurance.  That care is emergency room care, some of the most expensive medical care there is.  Who pays for it?  It’s a transfer cost, an ‘administrative cost’ charged to your health insurance, which in turn raises your rates.  Transfer costs exist because Congress passed an unfunded mandate requiring hospitals to give free care.

“Unfunded mandates should be repealed. If Congress insists on giving away free medical care — not my recommendation — they should pay the costs.  Replacing an unfunded mandate and a hidden cost transfer with a funded mandate eliminates a tax–the hidden tax on your health insurance.  It makes that cost visible and makes Congress answerable for it.  That’s the first step in the right direction.

Read the rest of this entry »

Does Liberty fulfill needs

Posted in Freedom's Flame by R Lee Wrights on March 26th, 2008

by Joey B. King

Joey B. KingFrom time-to-time I like to write about psychological theories and the relevance that these theories have to the Liberty movement. It is very important for those of us within the movement to take these theories into account when talking to new recruits or planning strategy. In this essay I would like to discuss Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Basically, Maslow said that human needs are prioritized, and lower priority needs must be satisfied before moving to a higher need. He also thought that everyone had one need that was predominant at any given time.

For example, the need for water is more important than the need for food because a human being can go days without food, but only a few hours without water.  When one’s water need has been satisfied, then human beings will seek to fulfill a higher need such as food. Maslow arranged his hierarchy into an 8-tiered pyramid.

The first need is Physiological. Things such as food, shelter, air, and clothing would qualify as physiological. As we know, these needs are largely fulfilled in the industrialized world. However, it is impossible to overlook the fact that socialized governments have insured the most basic of needs are “guaranteed.” Of course this also has the added benefit of insuring votes for politicians who provide this  “guarantee.” Does Libertarianism promise to fulfill this most basic of human needs? I think we’d have to say probably not or at least not directly.

Read the rest of this entry »

There’s good news and there’s bad news

Posted in Liberty's Lady by R Lee Wrights on March 25th, 2008

by Lady Liberty

Lady LibertyIf you rely on traditional media outlets or government spokesmen to get the news, the chances are good that you’re confused. From the government and conservative media, we hear what a success the war efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan are; from the liberal and libertarian media, we hear of ongoing opposition to our very presence in these countries. From conservative sources, we hear that basic scientific principles such as evolution are in serious question; from the traditionally more liberal academic community, we hear precisely the opposite.

Some of the choices of stories for broadcast or publication may, indeed, be based on bias. Internet news purveyor WorldNetDaily, for example, is literally unable to use the term “gay” without placing it in quotation marks, and frequently references something it calls the “homosexual agenda.” It regularly runs features that include stories sympathetic to prayer in the classroom or the teaching of intelligent design under the banner of “brave new schools.” But in all fairness, WorldNetDaily has always billed itself as a conservative news source.

Other outlets, however, claim to be fair and unbiased. But their decisions as to priorities or publication at least hint otherwise. Just this week, the disparity in lead stories between the purportedly liberal CNN and the supposedly conservative Fox News networks was interesting. At one time, the lead story on CNN featured Michael Jackson and his ongoing trial on child sexual abuse charges; at precisely the same time, the lead story on Fox News was a guilty plea by Mark Hacking who admitted in a Utah courtroom that he’d killed his wife while she slept. Both CNN and Fox News did tell both stories, but the emphasis was dramatically different.

Read the rest of this entry »


« Previous entries