Archive for January, 2008

Conservatives, liberals, and other trash talk

Posted in Random Thoughts by R Lee Wrights on January 31st, 2008

by Matthew Holmes 

Matthew HolmesWith the upcoming elections we will no doubt hear many negative ads denigrating the opposition as “conservative” or “liberal.”  People often use these two words when trying to brush off or silence those with whom they disagree.  Personally, I do not like being lumped into either camp, but tend towards the “liberal” camp.

But if you are like most Americans, who tend to be somewhere in the middle of these two extremes, this political trash talk probably tends to turn you off from politics rather than get you interested and involved.  Don’t let it.  It is precisely your involvement that brings some balance to the governance of our society.  As such, I would like to quickly respond to some of the popular rhetoric from the two camps.  If you are easily offended, please read no further.

Extreme right-wing Conservatives rant that the “liberals” have destroyed “our country” and are destroying our “way of life”.  First of all, it is not your country.  You happen to share it with millions of other people, who all have just as much of a say in how things operate here as you do.  You do not own America anymore than the liberals do.

And quit trying to recreate 1950’s “Leave It to Beaver” America and shove your “traditional family values” down everyone else’s throat.  If this is how YOU want to live, then do it.  No one is stopping you. Teach your kids about abstinence, God, and how the American Founders were Christians, but don’t expect those who disagree with you to foot the bill for it through public education.  I personally agree with “traditional morality” but this kind of teaching belongs in the home and within religious communities, not at public schools.

Read the rest of this entry »

Concerning purity

Posted in Power to the People by R Lee Wrights on January 31st, 2008

by Scott McPherson

Libertarian Party“What’s principles good for, if we isn’t persistent?”

- Harriet Beecher Stowe, Uncle Tom’s Cabin

During the 2000 election season, the Reform Party suffered a massive ideological upheaval as the vaguely-defined “centrist” politics of Ross Perot and Jesse Ventura were overwhelmed by a massive influx of Buchananite conservatives bent on taking over the party.  What is most interesting about those events is that at no time was there any serious concern that such a takeover could or would happen to the Libertarians.  Unlike Reform Party members (or any other party, for that matter), members of the Libertarian Party adhere to a clearly stated, easily defined moral principle that serves as the backbone of our platform.  The Libertarian Party is, simply, the political manifestation of a philosophical movement that began, for all intents and purposes, when Ayn Rand asked, “Who is John Galt?”

Up to that point, there was no such thing as a Libertarian-only libertarian.  From Locke and Jefferson to Hayek, Von Mises and Goldwater, the appropriate label for advocates of limited government and free markets had been “Whig” or “classical liberal”, which evolved into the small “L” libertarian.  Rand’s unique contribution to the formation of the Libertarian Movement was a simple statement near the end of her longest and most profound novel, Atlas Shrugged, when the hero of her story announces to the world, “there is one act of evil that…no man may commit against others and no man may sanction or forgive.  So long as men desire to live together, no man may initiate…the use of physical force against others.”  But far from being a mere footnote to the Libertarian Party’s history, her proclamation serves as the guiding rule which defines our party, members and philosophy-the acceptance of which is a condition of membership, shown by the signing of our pledge: I do not believe in or advocate the initiation of force as a means of achieving political or social goals.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Libertarian Party’s response to the State of the Union Address

Posted in Sound Off Soapbox by R Lee Wrights on January 30th, 2008

by William Redpath 

William RedpathFollowing President Bush’s annual State of the Union Address, the Libertarian Party issued their response from National Chairman William Redpath:

Tonight’s State of the Union address went much as expected.  Instead of calling for a more limited role of the federal government in American society, the President laid out plans that would only increase the government’s intervention into the realm of economics, health care, education and foreign policy.  It is unfortunate to see that after seven years of increasing the size of government and increasing the government’s presence in the day to day lives of all Americans, the President refuses to limit the scope of the federal government, a once championed virtue of the President’s party.  The President’s last State of the Union address encapsulated his legacy of an abandonment of the principles of limited government and individual freedom.

While the Libertarian Party applauds the President on taking a stand against wasteful government spending–though his administration has been a large contributor to this problem–and opening up more foreign markets to trade, we offer the following solutions to issues the President brought up in his address:

Read the rest of this entry »

Roasted Constitution

Posted in Serious Levity by R Lee Wrights on January 30th, 2008

by Kevin Joseph Tull

Kevin TullEnough about the Constitution already! C’mon folks they outlawed it a long time ago. It seems like forever since anyone could possess more than an ounce of the Constitution and not do jail time.

So why do people even bother to claim that there is such a thing as Constitutional rights? The document was written over two hundred years ago by girlie men who wore powdered wigs, knickers and had frilly fabric hanging out all over their clothes, with big sissy buckles on their shoes. For God’s sake they wore hose!

But now we whine about our constitutional rights daily. The President gets passed some oppressive legislation so they can place a camera, microphone and loudspeaker in every orifice of our bodies and people say “That’s unconstitutional!” Doh! Did they really expect the government that gave us Japanese summer camps and “dropout” protesters at Kent State, to somehow suddenly realize the error of their ways and start repealing unconstitutional legislation that fills volumes that reach to the moon and back. NASA could save a ton of money if they would just stack those books up to the next planet they plan to visit and send some little robots climbing on up there.

Everything’s changed since September 11th, so now we all have to make sacrifices of our freedoms. You just don’t know what 85 year old grandmother, with an oxygen tank and a walker might be planning the next dirty bomb attack. So if we suspend the Constitution, for a little while, over a fire and arrest anyone who sniffs too deeply the smoke of its burning hemp then we should be glad we are rid of the thing.

Read the rest of this entry »

How the NeoCons stole freedom

Posted in Walking Towards Liberty by R Lee Wrights on January 29th, 2008

by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

Melinda Pillsbury-FosterWhat do the environmental movement, the United Nations, and the Republican Party have in common? Each was successfully taken over by the elements we now are beginning to know as NeoCons either in this generation or earlier. Forget the Bilderbergers and the Illuminati. It isn’t a conspiracy, it was just ‘good’ business.

When America celebrated Earth Day this last April 22 it was celebrating the day the environmental movement was taken over by elements we now identify as Neoconservatives - although the people so identified are not new and are certainly not conservative. More on that later.

The original Earth Day is not forgotten, however. It has been celebrated since 1971 in the Peace Garden at the United Nations at the moment of the Spring Equinox with the ringing of the Peace Bell. Those who remember the original goals of the environmental movement included peace for the human family as a whole have preserved the original local and global focus.

Ringing bells sound across the globe at the moment of the Equinox which is shared by all living things. The founders of the Earth Society, chief among these John McConnell, had looked for and identified a day of renewal that spoke to their goals for the then nascent environmental movement. They saw a world of people who valued living lightly on Earth, who saw small, local solutions as the ones that best connected people to each other and to the Earth. It was a moment that resonated perfectly with the work of such native San Francisco institutions as the Sierra Club when it was small and personal, assuming individual accountability, responsibility, and simply doing the right thing. It was therefore entirely appropriate that in 1970 Equinox San Francisco became the first official entity to recognize Earth Day.

Read the rest of this entry »

Why I love the Free State Project

Posted in The N.C. Way by R Lee Wrights on January 29th, 2008

by Sean Haugh

Sean HaughGod bless Killington, Vermont, the first whole city to join the Free State Project and try to move to New Hampshire.

In case you hadn’t heard, last week the residents of Killington voted overwhelmingly to secede from Vermont and join their neighbor to the east. That’s pretty darn remarkable, especially when you consider that Killington is smack dab in the middle of Vermont, and not on the New Hampshire border.

Why would the good people of Killington want to do such a thing? Taxes, pure and simple. Somebody up there figured out that Killington sends about $10 million in tax revenues up to Montpelier, and only gets back about $1 million. They looked east, saw lower taxes and smaller government, and decided they would rather be there.

Of course, the odds are low against this actually happening. Vermont is not going to let go of all those taxes those skiers rack up, not without a fight. New Hampshire, meanwhile, is cautiously encouraging, but only up to the point before they antagonize their neighbor.

Read the rest of this entry »

More pressure needed to convince Bush to withdraw brief

Posted in Doing Something by R Lee Wrights on January 28th, 2008

by GOA staff

GOAThe Bush administration has continued veering toward gun control. You know it is bad when The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence salutes the administration’s support for gun control.

Why would anti-gunners praise the Bush administration? For one, signing the first gun control legislation in over a decade, the Veterans Disarmament Act (H.R. 2640). For another, the very anti-gun brief the Solicitor General (the Justice Department’s lawyer) filed in the DC gun ban case, D.C. v. Heller.

As you know, Rep. Virgil Goode is rounding up other members of the U.S. House of Representatives to join with him on his letter to the President asking him to withdraw that brief.

Gun Owners of America has taken the lead in building public awareness of the Solicitor General’s action, and the need to urge all members of Congress to support Rep. Goode’s efforts.

Read the rest of this entry »

CCRKBA backs proposal to ease CCW rules for Military stationed in Nebraska

Posted in Press Releases by R Lee Wrights on January 28th, 2008

from CCRKBA

Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear ArmsThe Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms today announced its support for legislation introduced by State Sen. Mark Christensen that would amend the state’s concealed carry law to provide a residency exception to non-resident military personnel stationed in the state.

CCRKBA Field Rep. Timothy Tyrrell said this measure will benefit service men and women who have taken an oath to defend the country, and want to have the means to defend themselves and their families while on duty in the Cornhusker State. He noted that since Nebraska does not have a reciprocity or recognition provision in its concealed carry law, this change will allow members of the military to have the same ability to obtain a Nebraska permit, after 180 days of continued residence in the state.

“This is a good thing for members of the military stationed here,” Tyrrell said. “It’s a good thing that Sen. Christensen is doing.”

Under Christensen’s bill, LB826, military applicants for a Nebraska carry permit would have to meet the same qualifications as any other citizen who applies.

Read the rest of this entry »

No license to license: The federal government needs to get real with the Real ID Act

Posted in Liberty's Friend by R Lee Wrights on January 27th, 2008

by LP staff 

Libertarian PartyWhile Friday’s press conference with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff outlined new steps towards implementing federally mandated requirements for state-issued driver’s licenses, the Libertarian Party is calling to scrap the program altogether.  “It’s time for the federal government to get real with the Real ID,” says Libertarian Party Executive Director, Shane Cory.

“The program is an unmitigated disaster,” says Cory, “and one the federal government fails to recognize.  The federal government can prattle all it wants about the benefits of a license that meets federal standards, but the states don’t recognize the right of the federal government to tell them how to issue their licenses.  It’s a states’ rights issue as much as it is a privacy issue.”

The Real ID Act imposes costly federal mandates for procedures used by states in issuing driver’s licenses. Despite the mandates, Congress provides no funding for implementation, leaving the states fully responsible for the expenses.

Read the rest of this entry »

Driver’s license privacy

Posted in Dangerous Politics by R Lee Wrights on January 26th, 2008

by Dave Kopel

courtesy of Kevin TumaActress Rebecca Schaeffer, co-star of the television series “My Sister Sam,” had a lot of admirers. One admirer, a crazy gentlemen named Robert Bardo, decided he wanted to kill the actress.

Killer Bardo had no idea where the actress lived, but luckily for Bardo, the state government of California provided him with his victim’s address.

Bardo went to a private investigative agency, claimed that Ms. Schaeffer was a long-lost friend, and asked for help in tracking her down. The investigative agency went to the California Department of Motor Vehicles, paid a one-dollar fee, and was told the address that Ms. Schaeffer had listed on her driver’s license.

Bardo took a bus from Tucson to Los Angeles and walked 12 miles to her house. He pressed her intercom button. It was broken, so Ms. Schaffer came down to see who it was.  Startled, Bardo left.  He came back in an hour and pressed her intercom button again. When she came down a second time to answer the door, he shot her dead.  This happened on July 18, 1989.

The teenage rock star Tiffany was harassed by another deviant fan who learned her address from the motor vehicle records.

Read the rest of this entry »


« Previous entries