Archive for November, 2007

Iraqi draftees: We should care about their boys, too

Posted in LFA Flashback by R Lee Wrights on November 30th, 2007

by Glenn Sacks

Glenn SacksHundreds of thousands of protesters around the US have demonstrated against the coming war against Iraq, decrying the inevitable civilian casualties and expressing fear for the safety of “our boys” in the armed forces. Proponents of the war have expressed similar concerns, though from a different angle. This is as it should be, but there is one major element missing from the discussion–the young Iraqi soldiers who will die in this war.

The Defense Intelligence Agency estimates that in the last Gulf War 100,000 Iraqi soldiers were killed and another 300,000 were wounded, compared to less than 10,000 Iraqi civilians killed or wounded. The Iraqi government puts its military losses at 75,000 to 100,000 and its civilian losses at 35,000 to 45,000.

The carnage was particularly gruesome on the road from Mutlaa, Kuwait, to Basra, Iraq, dubbed the “Highway of Death,” upon which tens of thousands of young Iraqi soldiers were killed as they tried to leave Kuwait. Some of the charred and dismembered bodies littering the highway were those of child soldiers, whom Iraq used in both the war against Iran and the Gulf War.

Read the rest of this entry »

GOA to weigh in on the Supreme Court gun ban

Posted in Doing Something by R Lee Wrights on November 29th, 2007

by GOA staff

GOABy now, you have probably heard the news which was delivered prior to Thanksgiving that the U.S. Supreme Court will be taking up the DC gun ban case.

Gun Owners of America’s foundation (GOF) will be submitting an amicus brief before the Supreme Court in support of the lower court’s decision that the Second Amendment protects an individual right.

The case, D.C. v. Heller, resulted in nullification of the gun ban in the District of Columbia.  Judge Laurence Silberman wrote the majority opinion for the DC Court of Appeals which decided that the DC law violated the individual right to keep and bear arms protected by the Second Amendment.

Silberman’s opinion was based on an extensive review of the historical record which makes it clear that the militia was intended to be a mandatory body composed of all military-aged males who were required to own their own military weapons.  He found that the “state” referred to in the Second Amendment is a reference to society, not a political entity.

Read the rest of this entry »

Saving our children from fascist schools

Posted in Student Union, Walking Towards Liberty by R Lee Wrights on November 28th, 2007

by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

Melinda Pillsbury-FosterIn Florida last week children were traumatized by protocols that for two days in a row kept them locked down in schools away from their parents. The reason given? A crime had taken place that is normally handled by the police. In these cases the two separate crimes, a robbery and an escaped convict, were used to justify a complete lock down of the area around Ft. Lauderdale.

Government schools are unsafe, frightening, and also fail to teach. Students graduate without understanding elementary book keeping, the principles of electricity, much less physics, how our courts work and many other subjects that two generations ago were assumed as basic parts of becoming a literate, functioning adult.

In Maryland today parents who entrusted their children to government schools are facing jail time for refusing to do what many experts now say is hazardous to their health, immunizations.

The events were reported in News Target, an online magazine that keeps Americans apprised of health alternatives. That article stated,

Read the rest of this entry »

Uncle Sam wants you to shut up, pay and obey

Posted in Liberty Rant by R Lee Wrights on November 27th, 2007

by Donna Mancini

Donna ManciniI am 56 years old. To many of you I could be your Mother. Actually, my own now 28-year-old son first introduced me to My Space (blogging), signed me up and got me started.

When I was in high school and college sex, drugs, rock n’ roll, smoking, trans fats, seat belts, helmets, bigoted aka hate speech, bullying (whatever that means), protesting, and other assorted activities were either right or wrong from a social, moral or health perspective. However, your personal behavior was guided by “Miss Manners,” your doctor, your momma, your religion, plus a hefty dose of your conscience and common sense, but not the government and its “rule enforcers” known as the police!

And, what is this ever-expanding, perverted “public good” ideology that what you do in the privacy of your home or business, and how you parent your children, is anyone’s concern other than your own? Here I am specifically alluding to the new laws passing smoking and trans fats bans in falsely-defined “public places;” and, forcing parents to vaccinate young girls for cervical cancer; and, threatening jail for other parents who may disapprove of vaccinating their children. When I grew up the accepted wisdom was “a man’s home and business is his castle; and, Father and Mother know best!”

Read the rest of this entry »

Help families educate their children and help businesses reward their employees

Posted in Stand Up For Liberty, Student Union by R Lee Wrights on November 26th, 2007

by George Phillies

George PhilliesThere is no family responsibility more important than educating the next generation.  You may be wealthy or poor.  You may be healthy or sick. No matter your conditions, you can be sure:  If your children are not educated well, they will end up poor and sick.

As Libertarians, we believe that competitive private and market solutions will generally provide superior answers to challenging questions.  Private and home schooling should offer children a richness of individually-designed education programs that other arrangements will find difficult to match. However, sensible Libertarians also recognize that public schools enjoy two huge advantages, namely large tax subsidies and a huge market and production base already in place.

How can Libertarians change America from where we are, to where we want to go, on a path each of whose steps is positive?  Any proposed change must add to what is already there, not take away options from parents anxious for their children.

Read the rest of this entry »

Individual rights: Up in smoke on CU campus

Posted in Student Union by R Lee Wrights on November 25th, 2007

by Jessica Peck Corry

Jessica Peck CorrySmoking first. Then cheeseburgers. So goes the logical extension of Michael Carrigan’s thinking. The well-intentioned University of Colorado regent is currently pushing a system-wide ban on all outdoor smoking. He says he was inspired by his desire to protect young people from dying of lung cancer. “I’ve had a number of close relatives die from smoking, including my grandparents and my uncle, who was my namesake,” Carrigan told the Rocky Mountain News. “I would like to see the next generation be free of smoking.”

But if saving people from the bad decisions they want to make is what this crusade is all about, shouldn’t banning cholesterol-laden fast food as a way to fight heart disease be his top target? After all, it’s heart disease–and not lung cancer–that is America’s number one killer, taking nearly a million U.S. lives every year.

But then why stop at heart disease? Let’s take on all of America’s most lethal killers. Diabetes must be next. As a diabetic myself from an immediate family of five diabetics, shouldn’t the government also protect my daughters from the future possible complications of the disease?

Candy bars must go. And no more sugary cereals in the dormitory cafeterias. Carrigan could push to impose fat-taxes on all off-campus pizza joints. Surely, he’d be able to find receptive allies in the Boulder City Council. Perhaps CU could mandate an hour of exercise every day.

Read the rest of this entry »

SAF excited about Supreme Court review of Heller case

Posted in Doing Something by R Lee Wrights on November 24th, 2007

by SAF staff

SAFFor the first time in United States history, the Supreme Court will hear a case that should, once and for all, decide the meaning of the Second Amendment to the Bill of Rights, and the Second Amendment Foundation could not be happier.

“We are confident that the high court will rule that the Second Amendment affirms and protects an individual civil right to keep and bear arms,” said SAF founder Alan M. Gottlieb. “Previous Supreme Court rulings dating back more than a century have consistently referred to the Second Amendment as protective of an individual right, but the case of District of Columbia v. Heller focuses on that issue, and we expect the court to settle the issue once and for all.”

The court announced today that it will hear an appeal of the case, in which seven Washington, D.C. residents have sued to overturn the district’s 31-year-old gun ban. In March, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that the ban is unconstitutional because it violates the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The court further ruled that the amendment does protect an individual right. The ruling set off a firestorm, in which gun control proponents, who had frequently claimed to support a right to keep and bear arms, dropped all pretenses and publicly acknowledged that they do not believe there is such a right protected by the Second Amendment.

Read the rest of this entry »

How to date Ann Coulter (If you must)

Posted in LFA Flashback by R Lee Wrights on November 23rd, 2007

by Kenn Gividen

Kenn GividenI’ve decided to go public with my intentions: I will not be asking Ann Coulter for a date. There are some good reasons.

First, I’m married. Second, there is a substantial age differential. And, third, I fear rejection.

While reading Coulter’s book, How to Talk to Liberals (If You Must), I thought about the prospects.

A single, middle-aged guy who’s still trying to look like he’s in his 20s would make a perfect match. But before you pick up the phone to pop the question, there are some things you need to know.

Keep in mind, for example, that Ann Coulter is relatively good looking. “Relative to what?” you ask. “A ‘58 Buick? Tapioca? Phyllis Schlafly?”

Read the rest of this entry »

Bon Appetit

Posted in Tuma's Toons by R Lee Wrights on November 22nd, 2007

by Kevin Tuma

Kevin Tuma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read the rest of this entry »

Chewing and grinding

Posted in NtheDrgWar by R Lee Wrights on November 21st, 2007

by Bob Newland

courtesy of Kevin TumaDay after day, it chews and grinds. Its only purpose is chewing and grinding. The chewing and grinding gives it no satisfaction, only another day of existence. Another day of chewing and grinding. The War on Some Drugs has endless hunger.

Eric Sage, 31, works at a family-owned manufacturing company in Sidney, Nebraska. He was riding his motorcycle home August 7, after spending a couple of days at the Sturgis (South Dakota) Motorcycle Rally, accompanied by Jorge, who was driving Sage’s pickup with passengers Kalie and Barb.

Sage was stopped by South Dakota Highway Patrolman Dave Trautman ten miles east of Rapid City (South Dakota) on Interstate 90 for weaving in his own lane. Jorge pulled over also, and stopped ahead of Eric’s bike, which was ahead of the patrol car. The patrol car’s dash cam records video of what happens in front and audio of what’s said in the car.

Trautman tickets Sage for a minor traffic infraction, then asks him to wait by the guardrail while he talks to Jorge. Trautman brings Jorge to the car, berates him for tailgating, then asks for permission to search the pickup. Jorge tells him the pickup is Eric’s, but gives permission when Trautman tells him the driver has that right. Trautman leaves Jorge in the car, gets out and pauses to say something to Sage.

Read the rest of this entry »


« Previous entries