Archive for July, 2007

Republic or Democracy?

Posted in Of The People by R Lee Wrights on July 31st, 2007

by Ed Lewis

courtesy of Kevin Tuma“A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.”

- Thomas Jefferson

This could just as well have been titled “Liberty (Freedom) or Servitude” because to answer “Republic or Democracy?” is exactly the same as answering “liberty” or “servitude.”

How can such questions be answered, with the full import of the difference between being free (Republic) and NOT being free (Democracy)?

Let us assume you have just purchased your home, a home you are proud of except for the color.  It is white, as is all others houses on your street.  But, you want to paint it colonial blue with darker blue trim and shutters.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Libertarian Party: Libertarian Ritual

Posted in Walking Towards Liberty by R Lee Wrights on July 31st, 2007

by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

Melinda Pillsbury-FosterRepublicans have prayer breakfasts - Libertarians have the Statement of Principles, Nolan Chart, None of the Above, the Pledge, and the Dallas Accords.

There is no ritual more important to Libertarians than the Statement of Principles.  Written by a small clutch of people, including Dr. John Hospers and Sarah O’Connor Foster in a hotel room during the course of the national Convention in the Statement is mortared into the platform of the LP and cannot be excised with less than a 7 / 8th vote of all of the delegates attending the convention.  The wording reflects the verbiage of Ayn Rand, sacred to so many early Libertarians.

The Statement of Principles

We, the members of the Libertarian Party, challenge the cult of the omnipotent state and defend the rights of the individual.

Read the rest of this entry »

Choosing Foster Parents over Fathers

Posted in Liberated Musings by R Lee Wrights on July 30th, 2007

by Jeffery M. Leving and Glenn Sacks

Glenn SacksIn the heartbreaking Melinda Smith case, a San Diego father and daughter were needlessly separated by the foster care system for over a decade. Last week, Los Angeles County settled a lawsuit over the case for an undisclosed sum. Yet a recent Urban Institute study found that the Smith case typifies the way the foster care system harms children by disregarding the loving bonds they share with their fathers.

Smith was born to an unwed couple in 1988. Her father, Thomas Marion Smith, a former Marine and a decorated Vietnam War veteran, saw Melinda often and paid child support. When the girl was four, her mother abruptly moved without leaving a forwarding address. Two years later, Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services found that Melinda’s mother was abusing her. Though the social worker for the case noted in the file that Thomas was the father, he was never contacted, and his then 6-year-old daughter was placed in the foster care system.

Thomas–whose fitness as a father was never impugned nor legally questioned–continued to receive and pay his child support bills. Authorities refused to disclose his daughter’s whereabouts, and didn’t even inform him that his daughter had been taken by the County. Smith employed private investigators and attorneys to try to find Melinda and secure visitation rights, but he eventually ran out of money.

Read the rest of this entry »

SF supervisor admits gun laws won’t work

Posted in Sound Off Soapbox by R Lee Wrights on July 30th, 2007

by SAF staff

SAFFollowing a vote Tuesday by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors to adopt tough new anti-gun laws, a sponsor of the ordinances admitted that they probably won’t quell violent crime, prompting the Second Amendment Foundation to call passage of these new ordinances an exercise in futility.

“Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, in a remarkable fit of candor, admitted to the news media that these new gun ordinances won’t stop violent crime,” said SAF founder Alan Gottlieb. “Yet the Board of Supervisors has voted to tighten its chokehold on the self-defense rights of law-abiding citizens and the one retail gun dealer in the city. This is ludicrous. You don’t stop criminals by punishing their victims.

“We sued the city more than 18 months ago over its ridiculous November 2005 gun ban initiative,” he recalled, “and by passing these ordinances, which are only slightly less restrictive than a ban, it appears the city now admits they will ultimately lose that lawsuit in court.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Understanding the Loss of Freedom

Posted in Carolinus by R Lee Wrights on July 29th, 2007

by R. Lee Wrights

R. Lee Wrights“When liberty is taken away by force it can be restored by force. When it is relinquished voluntarily by default it can never be recovered.”

- Dorothy Thompson, American newspaper columnist (1894-1961)

All Americans, if not all human beings, think they know how to define freedom. And, in all fairness most of them do understand personal freedom as it applies to themselves as individuals. However, when it comes to defining freedom in more general terms so as to allow its application to others most people, in my opinion, are sorely under-educated.  Human beings have a very hard time with the concept of allowing others to be as free as they themselves feel they deserve to be.

Why?

I think there are a number of factors in human nature that causes this phenomenon.  First and foremost is fear.  Fear is the fertilizer that grows governments to tyrannical proportions; and, the invisible phantom that causes individuals to willingly surrender their liberty.  People simply do not trust each other enough to allow their fellow citizens the same amount of freedom with which they themselves feel comfortable.  After all, we know we can trust ourselves, but how do we know we can trust our neighbor?  A byproduct of this uncertainty and mistrust is unfortunately, sacrifice.

Read the rest of this entry »

Four Theories and Insanity

Posted in Freedom's Flame by R Lee Wrights on July 28th, 2007

by Joey B. King

Joey B. KingWagner’s law is named after the German economist Adolph Wagner (1835-1917). Wagner’s law predicts that the development of an industrial economy will be accompanied by an increased share of public expenditure in gross national product.

Theory 1

During an anti-income tax protest recently, a friend of mine and I discussed fact that for some unexplained reason, modern democracies tend to have high tax rates. Later, I found out this phenomenon is known as “Wagner’s Law.” Wagner could not explain it either.

The only possible explanation I can come up with is this: taxpayers in wealthier countries can afford to give more and still maintain a comfortable lifestyle. In other words there is a bigger pie; the politicians can take more of the pie and redistribute it; and still leave the populace with enough to live on.

Read the rest of this entry »

Do we need warning labels for lies in the libraries?

Posted in LFA Flashback by R Lee Wrights on July 27th, 2007

by Linda Gorman

Linda GormanIn September 2000, publishing house Alfred A. Knopf handed professional librarians a knotty problem. It published Arming America, a book in which Emory University professor Michael Bellesiles outlined research supposedly showing that guns were rare in America from the Colonial period to the Civil War. The book was awarded Columbia University’s Bancroft Prize in history in April 2001, and immediately appeared in library collections around the country. 

As it turns out, Arming America is a lie. Many of the records cited by Bellesiles do not exist. He misrepresented the content of those that do exist and routinely distorted quotations taken from other historical sources. Bellesiles has also been unable to explain why probate inventories done by other researchers, notably Gloria Main of the University of Colorado, and James Lindgren of Northwestern, reach the opposite conclusion.

Had Arming America been true, it would have radically altered current understanding of the Second Amendment and strengthened the case for gun control laws. Legal debates over the proper interpretation of “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” focus on the definition of Militia and what the Founding Fathers considered “arms.” Gun control activists have been put on the defensive by a growing body of scholarly literature showing that the 18th century Militia more or less included “the people at large” and that those who wrote the Constitution clearly understood arms to mean firearms. Bellesiles “proved” the opposite, which may explain why the book received such lavish praise.

Read the rest of this entry »

UnFairness Doctrine could ultimately restrict Second Amendment rights

Posted in Back Door Politics by R Lee Wrights on July 26th, 2007

by GOA staff

GOAEven while we are busy defending our Second Amendment rights against efforts to enhance the Brady Law, there is a movement afoot to restrict our First Amendment rights as well… a movement that can make the defense of our liberties that much harder.

You may have heard of this effort as the “Hush Rush” bill or, just simply, as the Fairness Doctrine. No matter how you look at it, however, there is nothing fair about it.

Better termed the UnFairness Doctrine, it would radically limit the type of information you hear in the media and would greatly restrict access by Gun Owners of America to the airwaves.

Read the rest of this entry »

Social Liberties

Posted in Stand Up For Liberty by R Lee Wrights on July 26th, 2007

by George Phillies

George PhilliesFamily Values - There are few parts of family life more sensitive than guiding medical care for family members unable to act for themselves. In the Terry Schiavo case, Congress tried to steal control of her medical care. Congress voted against real family values. If you support real family values, you should elect Libertarians. We believe Uncle Sam has no business making life and death decisions for you and your loved ones.

The Kelo Decision - Your house should belong to you, not to the lounge lizard who bribed your city council. Eminent Domain takings should be limited to traditional public purposes. Eminent domain should not be used to steal your house for a developer or sports team.

The Mark of the Beast - The National ID card, whether disguised as a driver’s license or not, is the ultimate violation of your personal privacy. Generations of civil libertarians have known: State identity papers are a key milestone on the march to a police state.  I will vigorously urge Congress to repeal the Real ID act, the Patriot Act, and other laws attacking our freedom.

Read the rest of this entry »

Pollyanna Politics

Posted in Liberty's Lady by R Lee Wrights on July 25th, 2007

by Lady Liberty

Lady LibertyI’m not a signed member of any official political party. I do, however happen to be acquainted with a number of local Republicans, and so it was that I received an invitation to an event celebrating the Party’s nomination of George W. Bush as its official presidential candidate.

Not one to turn down the chance to chat with politicians and candidates in a casual setting, I accepted the invite. That evening, I stood in the background with a cookie-and a large grain of salt. I listened to the speeches and saw the room respond with cheers and applause, much the same way the audience in Madison Square Garden was behaving during its own program. And that night I saw it more clearly then than ever before: this was Pollyanna politics in action.

For those of you who don’t know, Pollyanna was the young heroine of a series of early 20th century novels who became even better known to a broader audience when Disney chose to make the story into a movie in the early 1960’s. Pollyanna appealed especially to children because she was an incurable optimist. No matter how bad things seemed, she perpetually saw the bright side. Her attitude proved infectious, and other characters soon learned something from the ever-hopeful girl. Of course, this being fiction, her optimism usually won the day, proving to one and all that a positive attitude is the tack to take. Unfortunately, such cannot always be said to be the case in real life. The case in point brings us full circle back to politics and to political rallies.

Read the rest of this entry »


« Previous entries